|
HUNTER’S MAGNUM OPUS, Papermaking by Hand in America
While printing Papermaking in Indo-China, Dard Jr. managed to work simultaneously
on another book his father was compiling. For the second edition of Papermaking:
The History and Technique of an Ancient Craft, Hunter had amassed
information about early American watermarks. Recognizing that little had
been written on the subject of American papermaking history, he wrote a
well-received article in the January 1946 issue of the magazine Antiques,
titled “Ohio’s Pioneer Paper Mills.” At the end of the article,
Hunter included a note, “The author of this article is gathering
material for a book on the early papermakers of Kentucky, western
Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Should any reader of Antiques
possess watermarked papers made in pioneer days in this region, or
have information relating to the early mills, please communicate with
Doctor Dard Hunter, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts.”
Readers did indeed send useful
information, and Hunter sent additional enquiries to most of the local
historical societies and libraries in those three states. Eventually,
Hunter expanded the book to include a description of the first mill
established in each state or colony from 1690 to 1817—from the year when
the first American papermaker, William Rittenhouse, began operating his
mill to the year Thomas Gilpin installed the first papermaking machine in
America. As the book neared completion, however, Hunter narrowed the focus
and changed the cut-off date to 1811.
For this new book, tentatively titled Papermaking
by Hand in America, Dard Jr.’s entire font was to be used for the
first time by the Mountain House Press. After the publication of Specimen
of Type and A Considerable
Speck, Dard Jr. wanted to re-cast his font by machine. In 1942, he
purchased used casting equipment from the defunct H.C. Hansen Type Foundry
in Boston. The machinery was stored there until March 1946, when it was
shipped to Mountain House. According to a small envelope containing one
piece of type, the first cast made on one of the Martin Torlsaas casting
machines was at 6:35 p.m. on
29 May 1946. Dard Jr.’s original matrices proved unsuitable, however,
and he struck and justified a second set using the Hansen machinery.
Over the next year, he worked on his
font of type in readiness for printing Papermaking
by Hand in America. In addition, he also cut punches for seventeen new
type ornaments, most of which were designed by his father. On one sheet of
paper, Hunter sketched ornaments for specific states; a flower for New
Jersey, a fish for Massachusetts, a stylized maple leaf for New Hampshire
and Vermont, and a lobster for Maine. (plate 80) The lobster was not
executed, however, and instead a pine tree represented that state. Some of
the ornaments were decidedly patriotic and included two versions of eagles
and a shield with “stars and stripes.” Hunter designed at least two
other ornaments, which, it appears, were never cast: a windmill, for which
a punch was cut, and a scallop shell. (Cornell also cut a punch of a
flower, but it was never cast.) Judging by other sketches that appear on
proofs of text pages, the ornaments were designed as printing went along.
The ornaments used in Papermaking by
Hand in America from the last two rows in plate 54. These were used
either singly or in combination with other “flowers” to produce
decorative chapter headings, tailpieces, and borders.
In the spring of 1947, Dard Jr. went to
Lime Rock to pack and ship to Chillicothe all of the remaining paper
stored there. After a careful inventory, Hunter was dismayed to find that
there was not enough of one type of paper to print Papermaking
by Hand in America. For the estimated 200 folio pages and 210 copies,
at least 21 reams of paper were required, more allowing for spoilage,
endpapers, guards, and fillers required for binding. In August, Hunter
wrote both the Hayle and Wookey Hole Mills asking for quotes on 30 reams
of paper to be made on the Bull’s Head and Branch watermarked moulds.
Before sending the order, however, he decided to flout convention and
print on four types of the most abundant of the Lime Rock papers. This was
a radical idea: the papers were all different weights, sizes, textures,
and colors. However, it is precisely these differences that give Papermaking
by Hand in America its unique visual and tactile qualities. (plate 81)
The most prevalent paper was white
and modern laid. Dard Jr. later stated that this paper
was unsuitably thin
and unsized making dampening and printing most exasperating and
sometimes almost impossible. The registration pins on the tympan of
the press would have a good tendency to tear the dampened sheets
during printing, thereby making registration on the verso page
improbable. It was almost a wonder that the printing of this folio
came out as well as it did considering all of the various obstacles
encountered.
Papermaking
by Hand in America was copiously
illustrated. The frontispiece was the sepia photogravure of the 1852
lithographic view of Mountain House and Chillicothe, first used in Primitive Papermaking. It was handcolored for the new book. To make
facsimiles of early documents, photographs and photostats were ordered
from historical societies and libraries, and line etching were made from
them. In addition, other illustrations were photographic prints, processed
by Dard Jr. in his newly equipped darkroom off the studio in Mountain
House. In early 1947, Hunter sent another round of letters requesting
photographs of early American ream labels, with a view to reproducing some
of these in the book. As if he did not have enough to do, Dard Jr. also
made facsimiles of watermarked paper at the Paper Museum in 1946 and 1947.
In reproducing
these watermarks, special attention had to be given in order to
imitate them to conform to the originals. Since all were of the laid
variety, to accomplish this, mould screens had to be woven to
duplicate the gauge of wire and number of laid and chain lines to the
inch. For a number of these screens, the wire was reduced to the
correct dimension through a drawplate. After approximately 5 month’s
labor, and with enduring patience, the task was finally concluded.
Before printing of Papermaking by Hand in America began in earnest, Hunter realized
that two presses would greatly facilitate printing. The large Shniedewend
Printers Proof Press, acquired in 1922, was ideal for printing
“two-up” (two pages at once), and it was reserved for the text pages.
The small Shniedewend hand press was still at MIT, and initially Hunter
did not want to move it. However, when he could not locate another, it was
shipped to Mountain House in August 1948. As usual the facsimiles were
printed first, although the ream labels continued to be printed up until
the book was ready for the binder in August 1950.
By the summer of 1947, the two Dards had
their routine down. Hunter “composed at the type case …without the
usual prepared copy customary in regular book composition, but with the
aid of copious notes and myriad references gathered together during the
many years of research.” On a good day, Dard Jr. could proof and print
two pages of text on the large press; his father printed the illustration
pages on a single leaf on the small one. *
When the time came for negotiations to
commence regarding the binding, Dard Jr. was delegated “manager.” In
October 1948, Dard Jr. informed Peter Franck that he had one or two more
chapters to print, and once those were done, he could start tipping-in the
illustrations and specimens for the copy to be sent for a trial binding;
he expected to complete the job that winter. While Franck was delighted
with the prospect of binding the book, he declined to give any estimate
until he received a complete copy.
Progress was slow, however, and without
finishing the type-setting, Hunter returned to MIT in December 1948. There
he suffered the first of a series of severe asthma attacks and had to
return to Mountain House. In many ways, his attack was fortunate, as it
allowed printing to continue almost non-stop during the first six months
of 1949. However, further delays were caused as more and more ream labels
were discovered, and the book continued to grow. Finally, in early
February 1950, Dard Jr. sent Franck a copy, still missing a few
illustrations. Even though the book was incomplete, Franck was impressed.
I am awed by the
work of creation, truly to be a testimonial to the work of Dard Hunter
and his disciple son. It is the BOOK PRESERVATIVE of the history of
American papermaking, a story beautifully told and done into a book of
beauty, interest and a charm all of its own. About the title page, I
also felt the impression of great top weight and am pleased that you
are reprinting it. I am not a critic of printing; often it is a matter
of opinion and taste anyway but I feel that there is enough poetic
charm in the book and its arrangement to outweigh any criticism which
may be made.
What
a job you accomplished in making all the many special watermarks and
papers so excellently done, and the picture gallery reproduced from
old paper labels which would inspire the most commercial papermaker of
our time to label-making of his own if he sees your collection in the
book. The texture of most of the text paper used looks innocently
delicate and refined. I hope to see a great deal of this book and have
more opportunity for study and discovery of the work…. I can wait
for the cover siding paper you are printing as I have other work at
present which will keep me alive….
IRISH
LINEN much heavier and better than we used before is available at
present. We bought a sample yard and a piece of it is included here.
An early decision by you on the use of this material for the edition
[and the printed side papers] would be wise. Do not be too economic
minded on the binding please as the people who buy the book will and
should be glad to pay for a decent binding job if it can
be and IS produced. I would also, somehow, make the buyers sense that
the books can not be run through the bindery like ordinary books and,
what of it; is it not the most extra ordinary book on papermaking that
ever was and is likely to be published?
Although
I dislike to suggest it, a slip case seems necessary in view of the
very irregular edges where dust can penetrate so easily.
I
think you are to be congratulated, both of you on the conclusion of a
fine job.
Dard Jr. and his father confirmed
with Franck that the binding was to be similar to that used for Old Papermaking in China and Japan, a three-quarter linen binding
with printed side papers. In early March 1950, Franck finished the trial
binding at a cost of $91. In the absence of the printed side papers, he
covered the book in his own marbled paper.* Franck wrote that after making
some changes, he was sure he could get the cost down to about $46 with a
slip case. Hunter was stunned at the price. He had envisioned charging a
modest $100 for the book, although book dealer Philip Duschnes and Elmer
Adler had urged him to charge at least $175. Hunter wrote a letter to
Franck, above Dard Jr.’s signature, stating that if the binding was $40
then the Press would realize a very small profit once other bills were
paid (including the salary paid to the pressman—Dard Jr.). Before the
letter was sent, however, Hunter wrote both Gerhard Gerlach and Arno
Werner asking for quotes based on a description of Franck’s binding.
Gerlach’s response is unknown, but in early May 1950, Werner wrote from
his bookbinding studio in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, acknowledging the
receipt of two copies of the book sent to him for a firm quote. Within two
weeks, Werner had completed the bindings. He estimated that the work
including a clamshell box covered in natural buckram with a back of red
leather would be $40. In the meantime, an anxious Franck wanted to know
what was holding up Hunter’s decision about his binding. Finally, in
August, Hunter visited Franck at his studio in Gaylordsville, New York
while en route to MIT. He brought with him both Franck’s and Werner’s
trial bindings. Franck’s opinion of Werner and his binding was made
clear in a letter received by Hunter a few days later.
I appreciate greatly
that you showed me the book-dummy which A.W. did for you. I am sure it
would never have happened through A.W. directly, although he has found
this an open “born” of technical information for a number of
years. We were at his place Saturday afternoon, last, and took him and
family up Greylock; Helen being the driver. He is getting a car
himself now and hopes to be a frequent visitor here. W. can be quite
generous, especially when his commercial backers the Eaton Co. prop
him up. I probably told you that this concern, a few years ago, sent
once of their head men around with Arno to take over, lock, stock and
barrel, mortgage and all, pay me 6 mills for a year and then probably
fire me again…. I will, of course, not mention a thing about the
dummy A.W. made, to the binder. It is all in the business of life and
living in a “tooth and claw” world, I suppose; anybody can draw
his own conclusions regarding this relationship of business, art, the
crafts, friendship, etc.
I can however see
that I have to be somewhat on my guard if [Cornelia and I] should
visit Europe. We may come back and find only one or two clients left.
As long as there is health with me there is little to be afraid of,
however.
In case you would
want Werner’s box—as we considered the possibility—it would be
best if you ask him directly for the price on the separate item.
My price for book and
box, at best could not come down to A.W. price. He has facilities
which I will never have, gluing machine etc. I doubt that he ever uses
homemade pastes etc. The time was too short that I could determine
details like that on your dummy of his. Most of your unsized papers
require special handling in pasting and he might have used something
more of a “quick sticker” but I do not know. The success of a job
with us was always based on principles of permanence and quality first
and then came the consideration of the dollar.
And who did the
binding? The Hunters compromised: the work was divided between Franck and
Werner. While both Hunters thought that Franck was the better binder,
Werner had a distinct advantage over him because his price was lower, and
he worked faster. It is estimated that Franck bound about 45 copies while
Werner bound approximately 115, for a total of the 160 copies sold by late
1953. One reason why Franck did not bind more copies was that he and
Cornelia took a trip to Germany—their first since the early 1920s—from
April to September 1951. Although Franck did bind a few copies of Papermaking
by Hand in America after his return, his professional relationship
with Hunter essentially ended in late 1951. (Just as had happened with
Adler, as soon as Hunter and Franck’s professional relationship ended,
one based on friendship blossomed. This camaraderie became especially
important to the two men after their wives died; Edith from a heart attack
in January 1951 and Cornelia from a tragic accident in March 1953.)
Having learned form past experiences,
the Hunters had waited to print the prospectus for Papermaking
by Hand in America until they had a much better idea of who would bind
the books and at what cost. Not only that, but they were still printing
facsimiles of ream labels. Finally, the book was ready. Elmer Adler, in a
letter dated 18 September 1950, thanked Hunter for the gratis copy of
Number Two of the new book. “I am more impressed than ever. It is a
remarkable accomplishment.” Adler also commented that he still
considered the price, $175, too low, but typically Hunter was not
convinced that the book would sell at the set price, let alone an even
higher one. The rush of orders took the Hunters completely by surprise.
Dard Jr. had not actually completed coloring the frontispieces, tipping-in
the illustrations, and collating the three hundred plus pages for all of
the copies. He worked diligently, and once a month sent completed books
out for binding in sets of ten.
On 29 November 1950, Hunter’s
sixty-seventh birthday, Elmer Adler scheduled an exhibit at Princeton
University featuring the first public showing of the new book; Dard
Jr.’s type appliances were also shown. It was this gesture that
confirmed Alder as a loyal friend, and it was he and D. Clark Everest who
were responsible for garnering the largest number of orders for the new
book.
With the publication of Papermaking by Hand in America, Hunter decided once and for all that
it would end his involvement in the Mountain House Press. His decision is
reflected in the seventh leaf on the printer’s mark, which flutters from
the branch. (plate 82) Dard Jr., however, was interested in writing and
publishing a book on decorated papers. But while information and various
papers were gathered from around the world, this project did not get much
beyond the planning stage, although a few line etchings were made.
O T H E R H O N O R S
In 1947, Frederic W. Goudy, the renowned
typographer, died. To honor him and other pioneer typographers, the
Lakeside Press and the R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company of Chicago
sponsored an exhibition, “American Type Designers and Their Work.”
Both Hunters’ typefaces were represented. In the accompanying leaflet,
Hunter’s type is described as “odd but forceful,” with a further
note that the type was “properly cut on punches by the designer.” In
fact, the Hunters were the only type designers who cut their punches,
justified the matrices, and cast the type by hand. For some reason, the
date of Hunter’s type was given as 1919; the first Chicago Society of
Etchers book predates that by four years.
In all, Hunter received four honorary
doctorates: Lawrence College in 1931, The Ohio State University in 1939,
Wooster (Ohio) College in 1947, and Lehigh University in 1949. In 1948, he
was awarded the prestigious A.W. Rosenbach Fellowship in Bibliography, and
the University of Pennsylvania arranged for him to give two Rosenbach
Lectures in April 1949. The first was on oriental papermaking, and the
second was based on the research he had been doing for Papermaking
by Hand in America. Although the University of Pennsylvania Press
routinely published the Rosenbach Lectures, Hunter suggested that they
instead publish a commercial edition of Papermaking
by Hand in America. They agreed and Papermaking
in Pioneer America was published in 1952 for $3; once again, Hunter
ensured that the information he had so arduously gathered was readily
available to all.
|